A Trumpet to Save the World:
Amitav Ghosh’s
The Great Derangement: Climate
Change and the Unthinkable
Abstract
Climate change has emerged as the most
pressing existential crisis of the twenty-first century, destabilizing
ecological systems, social orders, and cultural imaginaries across the globe.
Despite its magnitude and urgency, climate change has remained curiously
marginal within the domain of serious literary fiction. Taking Amitav Ghosh’s The
Great Derangement: Climate Change and the Unthinkable (2016) as its central
critical text, this article argues that the contemporary literary imagination
has failed to grapple adequately with the scale, violence, and unpredictability
of the climate crisis because of deep-seated aesthetic, historical, and political
constraints. Expanding upon Ghosh’s arguments, the article situates The
Great Derangement within current debates in ecocriticism, climate change
criticism, and Anthropocene studies, and reads it alongside key works of
climate change fiction such as Kim Stanley Robinson’s The Ministry for the
Future and Neal Stephenson’s Termination Shock. By integrating close
readings, theoretical discussion, and historical analysis, the article contends
that climate change fiction must move beyond the narrow focus on individual
experience and realist probability to imagine collective agency, nonhuman
participation, and alternative narrative forms adequate to planetary crisis. In
doing so, it positions Ghosh’s work as a foundational manifesto for
climate-conscious literature in the twenty-first century.
Keywords: Amitav Ghosh,
climate change fiction, The Great Derangement, ecocriticism,
Anthropocene, imperialism, carbon economy, collective action
Introduction: Climate Crisis and the
Crisis of Representation
Climate change is no longer a distant scientific
hypothesis or a speculative future scenario; it is a lived and escalating
reality that shapes everyday life through extreme weather events, rising sea
levels, ecological collapse, forced migration, and geopolitical instability.
Scientists describe the present moment as one of planetary emergency, while
scholars increasingly refer to the Anthropocene to designate an epoch in which
human activity has become a geological force. Yet, as Amitav Ghosh observes in The
Great Derangement, this overwhelming reality has left only a faint imprint
on the landscape of serious literary fiction. He famously remarks that climate
change “casts a much smaller shadow within the landscape of literary fiction
than it does even in the public arena” (Ghosh, 2016, p. 7). This striking
disparity between material catastrophe and cultural representation constitutes
what Ghosh terms the “great derangement” of our times.
The present article takes this diagnosis as its point of
departure. It argues that the marginalisation of climate change in mainstream
literature is not accidental but symptomatic of deeper aesthetic and
ideological formations that govern modern literary production. By revisiting
Ghosh’s critique of literary realism, his historical account of the carbon
economy, and his political reflections on freedom and collective action, the
article seeks to demonstrate how climate change challenges inherited modes of
storytelling and demands new narrative strategies. At the same time, it expands
Ghosh’s framework by engaging with recent developments in climate change
fiction and ecocritical theory, showing how contemporary writers are beginning
to respond to this challenge.
The article is organised into six sections. Following
this introduction, it examines Ghosh’s critique of modern realism and its
inability to represent climatic catastrophe. The third section situates The
Great Derangement in relation to the emergence of climate change fiction,
or “cli-fi.” The fourth explores the historical entanglement of climate change
with imperialism and the carbon economy. The fifth analyses Ghosh’s political
arguments concerning freedom, democracy, and collective response. The sixth
turns to encounters with the nonhuman world, focusing on the Sundarbans as a key
site in Ghosh’s environmental imagination. The conclusion reflects on the
implications of these discussions for the future of climate-conscious
literature.
The Limits of Modern Realism
One of the most provocative claims in The Great
Derangement is that the modern realist novel is structurally ill-equipped
to represent climate change. Ghosh traces the rise of the realist form to the
nineteenth century, when fiction increasingly turned away from epic events,
collective destinies, and improbable occurrences toward the detailed depiction
of everyday life and individual psychology. This shift, he argues, coincided
with broader intellectual trends that emphasised gradualism and predictability
in both natural and social sciences. As a result, events that appear sudden,
catastrophic, or statistically improbable—such as freak storms or unprecedented
floods—came to be seen as implausible within the logic of serious fiction.
Ghosh illustrates this problem through the notion of the
“uncanny.” Extreme weather events, he suggests, produce an uncanny effect
because they disrupt the assumed stability of the natural world and blur the
boundary between the normal and the extraordinary. Yet the realist novel,
committed to probability and plausibility, tends to exclude such occurrences.
As Ghosh puts it, “the very gestures with which the novelist creates a sense of
reality are precisely those that rule out the extraordinary” (2016, p. 24).
Consequently, climate change, which manifests through precisely such
extraordinary events, is relegated to the margins of literary realism.
This aesthetic exclusion has significant cultural
consequences. When climate catastrophe appears primarily in genres such as
science fiction or fantasy, it is implicitly marked as speculative or escapist rather
than urgent and real. Ghosh warns that this generic segregation contributes to
a collective failure of imagination, preventing societies from fully grasping
the magnitude of the crisis. In this sense, the limitations of realism are not
merely artistic but ethical and political. They shape what can be thought,
felt, and acted upon within the public sphere.
Recent ecocritical scholarship supports and extends this
argument. Critics such as Rob Nixon (2011) have drawn attention to “slow
violence,” forms of environmental harm that unfold gradually and invisibly,
escaping conventional narrative representation. Climate change intensifies this
problem by combining slow processes with sudden catastrophes, demanding
narrative forms capable of holding multiple temporalities together. Ghosh’s
critique thus exposes a fundamental mismatch between inherited literary forms
and contemporary ecological realities.
Climate Change Fiction and the Rise of
Cli-Fi
The perceived inadequacy of mainstream literary realism
has coincided with the emergence of climate change fiction, commonly referred
to as “cli-fi.” This loosely defined body of work encompasses novels, short
stories, and speculative narratives that foreground global warming, ecological
collapse, and their social consequences. Writers such as Kim Stanley Robinson,
Margaret Atwood, Paolo Bacigalupi, and Neal Stephenson have used speculative
and near-future scenarios to dramatise the trajectories of climate crisis and
to explore questions of responsibility, adaptation, and justice.
Kim Stanley Robinson’s The Ministry for the Future
(2020), for instance, imagines a near future shaped by catastrophic heatwaves,
mass migrations, and radical policy interventions. Structured as a polyphonic
narrative that includes fictional reports, eyewitness accounts, and economic
analyses, the novel departs from traditional realist conventions to represent
climate change as a global, systemic phenomenon. Similarly, Stephenson’s Termination
Shock (2021) explores the ethical and geopolitical dilemmas of solar
geoengineering, highlighting both the technological ambition and moral
ambiguity of attempts to control the climate.
While Ghosh acknowledges the imaginative power of such
works, he remains sceptical about their marginal status within the literary
field. He argues that as long as climate narratives are confined to genre
fiction, the mainstream novel can continue to evade the crisis. This division,
he suggests, mirrors broader hierarchies that separate “serious” literature
from speculative writing, reinforcing the very structures that contribute to
cultural denial. As he notes, “the climate crisis has arrived at a time when
the prestige of the novel has never been greater, yet its imaginative resources
have never been more constrained” (Ghosh, 2016, p. 9).
Nevertheless, recent criticism suggests that cli-fi is
increasingly influencing literary norms rather than merely occupying a marginal
space. Scholars such as Adam Trexler (2015) argue that climate change fiction
is reshaping narrative expectations by foregrounding collective agency,
nonhuman forces, and planetary scales. In this sense, cli-fi can be seen not as
a peripheral genre but as a laboratory for new forms of storytelling capable of
addressing the Anthropocene.
Imperialism, History, and the Carbon
Economy
In the historical section of The Great Derangement,
Ghosh challenges simplified narratives that attribute climate change to an
abstract notion of “humanity.” Instead, he situates the crisis within the
specific histories of imperialism, industrialisation, and fossil-fuel
capitalism. He traces the origins of the carbon economy to the expansion of
European empires, which relied on coal-powered technologies to secure military
and economic dominance. From steamships to railways, fossil fuels were integral
to the infrastructure of empire.
Ghosh’s discussion of figures such as Dwarkanath Tagore
illustrates how colonial elites were drawn into this carbon-intensive
modernity, often in the name of progress and development. At the same time, colonial
rule constrained industrial growth in much of Asia and Africa, producing a
deeply uneven distribution of emissions and vulnerabilities. As Ghosh observes,
“the history of capitalism is also a history of empire, and the history of
empire is inseparable from the history of fossil fuels” (2016, p. 87).
This historical perspective has crucial implications for
both politics and literature. It complicates narratives that frame climate
change as the result of universal human behaviour, instead highlighting questions
of historical responsibility and climate justice. For climate change fiction,
this means attending to colonial legacies, extractive economies, and the lived
experiences of communities in the Global South. Novels set in regions such as
the Sundarbans, the Niger Delta, or the Arctic foreground the uneven impacts of
climate change and challenge Eurocentric perspectives on the Anthropocene.
Politics, Freedom, and Collective
Response
Ghosh’s analysis of climate politics centres on the
tension between individual freedom and collective survival. He argues that
modern political systems, particularly liberal democracies, are poorly equipped
to address climate change because they prioritise short-term economic growth
and individual choice over long-term planetary stability. Climate discourse, he
suggests, has been excessively moralised, focusing on personal lifestyle
changes while avoiding structural transformations of energy systems and global
governance.
In a striking formulation, Ghosh writes that “the climate
crisis is also a crisis of culture, and thus of the imagination” (2016, p.
162). This crisis manifests politically in the inability to mobilise collective
action at the scale required. Elections, policy debates, and media narratives
remain trapped within national frameworks, while climate change operates on
transnational and intergenerational scales.
To address this impasse, Ghosh looks beyond conventional
political institutions to alternative sources of collective ethics, particularly
world religions. He contrasts the cautious language of international climate
agreements with the moral urgency of Pope Francis’s encyclical Laudato Si’,
which frames environmental degradation as a matter of social justice and
spiritual responsibility. Such perspectives, Ghosh suggests, may offer
resources for imagining forms of solidarity and sacrifice that modern secular
politics struggles to articulate.
For climate change fiction, this emphasis on collective
action challenges narratives centred on heroic individuals. Works like The
Ministry for the Future experiment with depicting institutions, movements,
and distributed agency, suggesting new ways of narrating political change. In
doing so, they respond directly to Ghosh’s call for literature that can imagine
collective futures rather than isolated moral adventures.
Encounters with the Nonhuman: The
Sundarbans
Ghosh’s engagement with climate change is grounded in
specific ecological landscapes, most notably the Sundarbans, the vast mangrove
delta shared by India and Bangladesh. This region, shaped by tides, cyclones,
and shifting river channels, exemplifies the precarious coexistence of human
and nonhuman life. In The Great Derangement, Ghosh describes the
Sundarbans as a place where the boundaries between nature and culture are
constantly unsettled, and where nonhuman forces assert their agency with
undeniable force.
The Sundarbans also reveal the unequal burdens of climate
change. Rising sea levels, salinity intrusion, and intensified storms threaten
both biodiversity and human livelihoods, forcing communities into cycles of
displacement and vulnerability. For Ghosh, such landscapes challenge
anthropocentric worldviews and demand narrative forms that acknowledge the
agency of animals, rivers, and ecosystems. As he notes, “to think of the world
in purely human terms is to overlook the many forces that shape our lives”
(2016, p. 141).
Climate change fiction increasingly turns to such liminal
environments to explore multispecies ethics and ecological fragility. By
foregrounding nonhuman actors and precarious ecosystems, these narratives
expand the scope of literary imagination and align with broader efforts in
environmental humanities to rethink human–nature relationships in the
Anthropocene.
Conclusion: Making the Unthinkable
Thinkable
The Great Derangement stands as one
of the most influential interventions in contemporary climate discourse
precisely because it exposes the cultural and imaginative dimensions of the
crisis. Ghosh’s critique of literary realism, his historical account of the
carbon economy, and his political reflections on freedom and collective action
together constitute a powerful call to rethink how stories are told in an age
of planetary emergency.
This article has argued that climate change fiction,
informed by Ghosh’s insights, must move beyond individualist narratives and
realist probability to engage with collective agency, nonhuman forces, and
global histories. Recent developments in cli-fi suggest that such
transformations are already underway, as writers experiment with new forms,
scales, and voices to represent the Anthropocene.
Ultimately, the task of climate-conscious literature is
not merely to reflect reality but to reshape the conditions of thought and
feeling through which reality is understood. By making the unthinkable
thinkable, literature can contribute to the cultural transformations necessary
for confronting climate change. If future generations are to judge this era
differently, it will be in part because writers, critics, and readers refused
to remain deranged in the face of planetary crisis.
References:
-
Earth.Org. (n.d.). 5 great climate change fiction
novels. Earth.Org. https://earth.org/climate-change-fiction-novels/[ppl-ai-file-upload.s3.amazonaws]
-
Ghosh, A. (2016). The great derangement: Climate
change and the unthinkable. The University of Chicago Press.wikipedia+1[ppl-ai-file-upload.s3.amazonaws]
-
GradeSaver. (n.d.). The great derangement study guide.
GradeSaver. https://www.gradesaver.com/the-great-derangement[ppl-ai-file-upload.s3.amazonaws]
-
Johns-Putra, A. (2016). Climate change in literature and
literary studies: From cli-fi, climate change theater and ecopoetry to
ecocriticism and climate change criticism. In Climate change in literature
and literary studies [PDF]. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291388137_Climate_change_in_literature_and_literary_studies_From_cli-fi_climate_change_theater_and_ecopoetry_to_ecocriticism_and_climate_change_criticism[ppl-ai-file-upload.s3.amazonaws]
-
MacConaghy, C. (2020). Migrations. Flatiron
Books.[ppl-ai-file-upload.s3.amazonaws]
-
Murtheppa, G. M. (2025). Revisiting ecocriticism and “cli‑fi”:
Reading climate change in contemporary fiction. Integral Review: A Journal
of Management, 17(4). https://integralresearch.in/index.php/1/article/view/470[integralresearch]
-
Outlook India. (2022, September 27). The rise of
climate change literature. Planet Outlook. https://planet.outlookindia.com/news/the-rise-of-climate-change-literature--news-414991[ppl-ai-file-upload.s3.amazonaws]
-
Robinson, K. S. (2020). The ministry for the future.
Orbit.[en.wikipedia][ppl-ai-file-upload.s3.amazonaws]
-
Stephenson, N. (2021). Termination shock. William
Morrow.[en.wikipedia][ppl-ai-file-upload.s3.amazonaws]
-
University of Chicago Press. (n.d.). The great
derangement: Climate change and the unthinkable. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/G/bo22265507.html[press.uchicago]
-
Wikipedia. (2023, August 10). The great derangement:
Climate change and the unthinkable. In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Great_Derangement:_Climate_Change_and_the_Unthinkable[en.wikipedia]
-
Wikipedia. (2023, July 5). The ministry for the future.
In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Ministry_for_the_Future[en.wikipedia]
-
World Literature Today. (2017, March). Climate change and
the unthinkable by Amitav Ghosh. World Literature Today. https://worldliteraturetoday.org/2017/march/great-derangement-climate-change-and-unthinkable-amitav-ghosh[worldliteraturetoday]
No comments:
Post a Comment